The Role of Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Female Incontinence in 2023: A Literature Update
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56570/jimgs.v2i2.133Keywords:
Artificial urinary sphincter, Female, Urinary incontinence, Urinary tract reconstruction, Refractory urinary incontinence, Urinary Stress Incontinence, Female IncontinenceAbstract
This in-depth analysis of the literature provides a 2023 update on the crucial function of artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) in the treatment of female incontinence. This review illustrates the tremendous advancements in AUS technology, particularly the introduction of flexible cuff pressure and occlusive cuff techniques, which have considerably improved treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. It draws on the most recent research from the last ten years. The AMS 800 AUS has established itself as the gold standard for treating male incontinence, but research into how to adapt it for female patients is still ongoing. Robotic assisted insertion and other minimally invasive procedures have the potential to improve safety and effectiveness. This review emphasizes the growing significance of AUS in the management of female incontinence and provides solid justification for its effectiveness, patient advantages, and economic viability. Further improving patient outcomes and quality of life, it also points to interesting directions for future study, including novel materials, device designs, minimally invasive surgeries, and bioengineered substitutes.References
Peyronnet, B., Gray, G., Capon, G., Cornu, J.-N., & Van Der Aa, F. (2021). Robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Current Opinion in Urology, 31(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000000837
Peyronnet, B., O’Connor, E., Khavari, R., Capon, G., Manunta, A., Allue, M., Hascoet, J., Nitti, V. W., Gamé, X., Gilleran, J., Castro‐Sader, L., Cornu, J., Waltregny, D., Ahyai, S., Chung, E., Elliott, D. S., Fournier, G., & Brucker, B. M. (2018). AMS‐800 artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 38(S4). https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23833
Peyronnet, B., Greenwell, T., Gray, G., Khavari, R., Thiruchelvam, N., Capon, G., Ockrim, J., Lopez-Fando, L., Gilleran, J., Fournier, G., Van Koeveringe, G. A., & Van Der Aa, F. (2020). Current use of the artificial urinary sphincter in adult females. Current Urology Reports, 21(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-01001-1
Constable, L., Cotterill, N., Cooper, D., Glazener, C., Drake, M. J., Forrest, M., Harding, C., Kilonzo, M., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., McDonald, A., Mundy, A., Norrie, J., Pickard, R., Ramsay, C., Smith, R., Wileman, S., & Abrams, P. (2018). Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after Prostate surgery (master): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2501-2
Peyronnet, B., Capon, G., Belas, O., Manunta, A., Allenet, C., Hascoet, J., Calves, J., Belas, M., Callerot, P., Robert, G., Descazeaud, A., & Fournier, G. (2019). Robot-assisted AMS-800 artificial urinary sphincter bladder neck implantation in female patients with stress urinary incontinence. European Urology, 75(1), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.036
Chung, E. (2020). Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the special populations: Neurological, revision, concurrent penile prosthesis and female stress urinary incontinence groups. Asian Journal of Andrology, 22(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_128_19
Broudeur, L., Loubersac, T., Le Normand, L., Karam, G., Branchereau, J., Rigaud, J., & Perrouin-Verbe, M. A. (2021). New technique of robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter implantation in female by a posterior approach with intraoperative cystoscopic monitoring. World Journal of Urology, 39(11), 4221–4226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03739-w
Hessels, D., Klein Gunnewiek, J. M. T., van Oort, I., Karthaus, H. F. M., van Leenders, G. J. L., van Balken, B., Kiemeney, L. A., Witjes, J. A., & Schalken, J. A. (2003). DD3PCA3-based molecular urine analysis for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. European Urology, 44(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00201-x
Costa, P., Poinas, G., Ben Naoum, K., Bouzoubaa, K., Wagner, L., Soustelle, L., Boukaram, M., & Droupy, S. (2013). Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. European Urology, 63(4), 753–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.008
Haudebert, C., Richard, C., Hascoet, J., & Peyronnet, B. (2023). Robotic extraperitonal artificial urinary sphincter implantation in female patients. European Urology, 83, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01443-4
Vayleux, B., Rigaud, J., Luyckx, F., Karam, G., Glémain, P., Bouchot, O., & Le Normand, L. (2011). Female urinary incontinence and artificial urinary sphincter: Study of efficacy and risk factors for failure and complications. European Urology, 59(6), 1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.006
Fournier, G., Callerot, P., Thoulouzan, M., Valeri, A., & Perrouin-Verbe, M.-A. (2014). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: Initial results. Urology, 84(5), 1094–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.013
Barakat, B., Franke, K., Hijazi, S., Schakaki, S., Gauger, U., Hasselhof, V., & Vögeli, T.-A. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. Arab Journal of Urology, 18(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598x.2020.1716293
Shokri, P., Kharaz, L., Talebian, N., Borumandnia, N., Ziaee, S. A., & Shakhssalim, N. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications of artificial urinary sphincters in female patients with urinary incontinence due to internal sphincter insufficiency. BMC Urology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01274-x
Phé, V., Léon, P., Granger, B., Denys, P., Bitker, M.-O., Mozer, P., & Chartier-Kastler, E. (2016b). Stress urinary incontinence in female neurological patients: Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800tm) implantation. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36(3), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23019
Islah, M., Cho, S. Y., & Son, H. (2013). The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter in male and female urinary incontinence. The World Journal of Men’s Health, 31(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2013.31.1.21
Popat, S., Tam, J., Koenig, H., Lucioni, A., Kobashi, K., & Lee, U. (2022). PD06-07 real-world urinary tract infection rates and antibiotic practice with urethral injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (BULKAMID®). Journal of Urology, 207(Supplement 5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000002525.07
Ameli, G., Chartier-Kastler, E. J., Anding, R. G., Van der Aa, F., Comiter, C. V., & Hübner, W. A. (2023). Artificial urinary sphincters in males and females and neurogenic patients, techniques, and indications. Continence Reports, 6, 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contre.2023.100028
Close, A., Robertson, C., Rushton, S., Shirley, M., Vale, L., Ramsay, C., & Pickard, R. (2013). Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: A Health Technology Assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. European Urology, 64(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.040
Phé, V., Léon, P., Granger, B., Denys, P., Bitker, M.-O., Mozer, P., & Chartier-Kastler, E. (2016a). Stress urinary incontinence in female neurological patients: Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800tm) implantation. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36(3), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23019
Schroeder, A., Munier, P., Saussine, C., & Tricard, T. (2021). Outcomes of laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter in women with stress urinary incontinence: Mid-term evaluation. World Journal of Urology, 39(8), 3057–3062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03527-y
Gunner, C., & Reid, S. (2016). Female artificial urinary sphincters: Early experience. International Journal of Surgery, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.449
Brito, C. G., Mulcahy, J. J., Mitchell, M. E., & Adams, M. C. (1993). Use of a double cuff AMS800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. Journal of Urology, 149(2), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36057-3
Deruyver, Y., Schillebeeckx, C., Beels, E., De Ridder, D., & Van der Aa, F. (2021). Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. World Journal of Urology, 40(2), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03877-1
Chung, E. (2014). A state-of-the-art review on the evolution of urinary sphincter devices for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: Past, present and Future Innovations. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 38(6), 328–332. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2014.899400
Adamakis, I., Vasileiou, I., & A. Constantinides, C. (2013). The treatment of iatrogenic male incontinence: Latest results and future perspectives. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials, 8(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574887111308010006
Koch, G. E., & Kaufman, M. R. (2022). The role of the artificial urinary sphincter: Current status and future innovations. Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, 17(4), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-022-00670-7
Biardeau, X., Aharony, S., Campeau, L., & Corcos, J. (2016). Artificial urinary sphincter: Report of the 2015 consensus conference. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 35(S2), S8–S24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22989
