The US Match Process in the ChatGPT Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56570/jimgs.v2i1.64Keywords:
ChatGPT, USMLE exam, Scientific writing, Co-author controversy, AI detection limitsAbstract
ChatGPT has caused a lot of controversy since it’s launch in November 2022. It has proven to perform tasks that have not been done before by previous AI language models. According to our literature review, it has: Passed the USMLE exam without any prior medical training or studying. Made its way into scientific writing, as shown by four preprint manuscripts that credit ChatGPT as a co-author which resulted in many scientific journals to ban including chatGPT as co-author. Shown to generate essays and abstracts that are not detected by AI-detector tools or plagiarism detectors.
References
Anderson N, Belavy DL, Perle SM, et al. AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023;9(1):e001568. Published 2023 Feb 16. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001568
Macdonald C, Adeloye D, Sheikh A, Rudan I. Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis. J Glob Health. 2023;13:01003. Published 2023 Feb 17. doi:10.7189/jogh.13.01003
The Lancet Digital Health. ChatGPT: friend or foe?. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5(3):e102. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00023-7
Hu G. Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers [published online ahead of print, 2023 Feb 25]. Account Res. 2023;1-3. doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2184262
Zumsteg JM, Junn C. Will ChatGPT Match to Your Program? [published online ahead of print, 2023 Mar 13]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;10.1097/PHM.0000000000002238. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002238
