journal
Journal For International Medical Graduates
Journal For International Medical Graduates
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology
US
https://www.cibnp.com
2832-9864
76
Articles
Systematic Review Methodology: Conducting High-Quality Reviews and Understanding Their Significance in Evidence-Based Practice
Travis Satnarine
Satnarine
Travis
travis.satnarine@jimgs.com
04
05
2023
Received: 452023
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal For International Medical Graduates
2023
Journal For International Medical Graduates
Systematic Review
Evidence-Based Practice
Research Question
Literature Search
PICO Framework
Data Extraction
Quality Assessment
Risk of Bias
Reporting Guidelines
PRISMA
[
Pati D, Lorusso LN. How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. HERD. 2018;11(1):15-30. doi:10.1177/1937586717747384
]
[
Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. How to write a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2761-2768. doi:10.1177/0363546513497567
]
[
Clarke J. What is a systematic review? Evidence-Based Nursing. 2011;14(3):64-64. doi:10.1136/ebn.2011.0049
]
[
Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013;2(1):9-14. doi:10.4103/2249-4863.109934
]
[
Ratan SK, Anand T, Ratan J. Formulation of Research Question. Stepwise Approach. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2019;24(1):15-20. doi:10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_76_18
]
[
Linares-Espinós E, Hernández V, Domínguez-Escrig JL, et al. Methodology of a systematic review. Metodología de una revisión sistemática. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018;42(8):499-506. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2018.01.010
]
[
Matharu GS, Buckley CD. Performing a literature review. BMJ. 2012. doi:10.1136/sbmj.e404
]
[
Butler A, Hall H, Copnell B. A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016;13(3):241-249. doi:10.1111/wvn.12134
]
[
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews. 2017;6(1). doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
]
[
Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):531-541. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.283
]
[
Polanin JR, Pigott TD, Espelage DL, Grotpeter JK. Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10(3):330-342. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1354
]
[
Meline T. Selecting Studies for Systemic Review: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 2006;33(Spring):21-27. doi:10.1044/cicsd_33_s_21
]
[
Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E. JBI's systematic reviews. AJN, American Journal of Nursing. 2014;114(7):49-54. doi:10.1097/01.naj.0000451683.66447.89
]
[
Norman C, Leeflang M, Névéol A. Data Extraction and Synthesis in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Corpus for Automating and Evaluating the Process. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2018:817-826. Published 2018 Dec 5.
]
[
van den Berg T, Heymans MW, Leone SS, et al. Overview of data-synthesis in systematic reviews of studies on outcome prediction models. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2013;13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-42
]
[
Luchini C, Veronese N, Nottegar A, et al. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools. Pharm Stat. 2021;20(1):185-195. doi:10.1002/pst.2068
]
[
Cochrane Methods Bias. RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials | Cochrane Bias. https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials. Accessed May 1, 2023.
]
[
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/ox ford.asp. Accessed May 1, 2023.
]
[
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. Amstar 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
]
[
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. Robins-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919
]
[
What is grade? BMJ Best Practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/us/toolkit/learn-ebm/what-is-grade/. Accessed May 1, 2023.
]
[
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Published 2021 Mar 29. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
]
[
Moher D. Optimal strategies to consider when Peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y
]
[
Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Title. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;17(4):e98326. Published 2019 Oct 22. doi:10.5812/ijem.98326
]
[
Cals JW, Kotz D. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part II: title and abstract. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(6):585. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.005
]
[
Linares-Espinós E, Hernández V, Domínguez-Escrig JL, et al. Methodology of a systematic review. Metodología de una revisión sistemática. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018;42(8):499-506. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2018.01.010
]